Arno Garrels wrote: > Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote: >> It's debatable whether a failed FEAT >> command should be ignored or reported, but I agree it's now backward >> compatible with v6 or v7 prior to this year. > > If FEAT failed it is the same as if there were no features so IMO > it should not trigger an error.
Of course only when called internally in one of the HighLevel methods. -- Arno Garrels -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
