Hello,
Don't you think that reverse-proxy is sufficient for that purposes, with no need
to modify servers themselves? Failover facilities should be external to
a server, imho, because they may fail if they are embedded into a server
which undergoes a failure.
Best wishes,
Stanislav Korotky.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fastream Technologies" <ga...@fastream.com>
To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:29 AM
Subject: [twsocket] Clustering/failover support for ICS
servercomponents--especially Web Server
Hello,
I wonder if this is in somebody's to-do list. Don't you see the demand I see
in this? If so, maybe we can collect money similar to what we did for the
ICS-SSL project which succeeded.
Best Regards,
SubZero
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
