I forgot to speak about threadetach/attach. I am already using them very well. I think the logic is good.
Regards, SZ On 2/24/08, Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Socket have to be closed from the thread context they have been > created. > > > WAIT a moment--what do you mean? I create the socket in the main thread > > pool, accept() there, then postthreadmessage to worker thread, serve, > then > > shutdown there and then destruct there. Do you say this is buggy? > > Yes, this is buggy. If you don't create the TWSocket instance in the > thread > context where you plan to free it, then you must use > ThreadDetach/ThreadAttach. > > > Can you show me an example? > > See the MT samples delivered with ICS. > Also search the mailing list archive for discussion about > ThreadAttach/ThreadDetach, this has been discussed several times. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare > The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) > http://www.overbyte.be > > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
