I would not believe -before trying myself- this is what M$ called "rewriting of TCP/IP stack"!!
:(( On 5/4/07, Dave Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From the limited exposure I've had to Vista (Home Basic) "client use". > A "Clean" install on the same hardware (P4 2GHz, 512MB Ram, 80G drive, > nVidia graphics) it run's at about half the speed of XP(Home) in just > about all respects. Whatever tweaks you do to it. > > Where'd the "Wow" go? > > Less than impressed (we re-installed XP as a result, did all the > updates, and the same machine really rocks again!) Of course, the > reseller will not take it back as the box is opened, will hang on to it > till we can get something bigger better and much faster to load it on. > > Dave B. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darin McGee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:00 PM > > To: ICS support mailing > > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any > > way to by-pass? > > > > That's way Vista is sold as a client OS and Microsoft sells > > separate server software. Also, read your XP and Vista > > licenses, they are not to be used as servers. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Fastream Technologies > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 2:53 AM > > To: ICS support mailing > > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Strange Vista winsock behavior--any > > way to by-pass? > > > > Yes that's what I guessed as well but if it's inherent to > > Vista then Vista is not much suitable as server OS. I wonder > > if the issue is in client side or server sockets? > > Unfortunately I sold my other desktop and my laptop in in > > service so I cannot check against XP/2003. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > SZ > > > > On 5/3/07, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fastream Technologies wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Recently I have upgraded my workstation to Vista Business > > 64-bit and > > > > face the following problem: > > > > > > > > - when run against IE7 or any other server, the ICS stress tester > > that > > > > I posted here before as well as Socrates, get into > > strange behavior: > > > > > > > > 1) After 1-2 mins, the sockets begin to not being accepted. The > > server > > > > simply does not work for the stress tester client. It works for > > > > browsers. > > > > > > > > 2) The socket establishment for IIS 7 in Connection: > > close mode is > > > > 2000 connections/sec where it was 4-5000 connections/sec > > on IIS6 on > > > > XP-x64. > > > > > > > > Any explanation/solution for these? > > > > > > May be some Vista setting to avoid such attacks? > > > Or may be Vista is just slower than XP? > > > > > > -- > > > Arno Garrels [TeamICS] > > > http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html > > > > > > > > > > > WARM Regards from Turkey where it is already hot! > > > > > > > > SZ > > > -- > This mail has been scanned by Palmer Cook Computer Services Limited. > www.palmercook.co.uk > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
