Thanks. Could one write a NAT and even a firewall with LSP without DDK? If so, we can just force Winsock 2 (which is required for this tech.), no problem.
Best Regards, SZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] Perhaps this I asked beforebut...(TransparentHTTPProxy) > As far as I know, the LSP main code has to be written using Microsoft > tools. > And you can probably use ICS within DLL you'll call from the LSP. > > -- > Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.overbyte.be > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:59 PM > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Perhaps this I asked before > but...(TransparentHTTPProxy) > > >> Can I use ICS with this technology or must I use the API directly? >> >> Regards, >> >> SZ >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> >> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:26 PM >> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Perhaps this I asked before but... >> (TransparentHTTPProxy) >> >> >>> Winsock LSP is what you need. >>> See http://www.microsoft.com/msj/0599/LayeredService/LayeredService.aspx >>> >>> -- >>> Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html >>> -- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://www.overbyte.be >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org> >>> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:45 PM >>> Subject: [twsocket] Perhaps this I asked before but... (Transparent >>> HTTPProxy) >>> >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> I wonder how could one code an ICS/Windows transparent proxy without >>>> NDIS >>>> for detecting the IP/Port? Let me clarify, since this is a trasnparent >>>> proxy, users should not need to enter proxy settings into their >>>> browsers. >>>> Therefore, we will need a Layer-4 TCP switch which would route all the >>>> port >>>> 80 traffic to our Windows. Now if the switch changes the destination >>>> IP, >>>> how >>>> will we at Winsock/ICS level will understand the destination server's >>>> IP >>>> for >>>> a basic request like, >>>> >>>> GET / HTTP/1.0 >>>> >>>> without Host header? I know Host header is a must for HTTP/1.1 but not >>>> for >>>> 1.0! Perhaps the Layer-4 switch can find a way to route without >>>> modifying >>>> the destination IP(?). I think I asked this before but did not get a >>>> real >>>> answer... >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> SZ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >>>> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >>>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >>> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list >> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket >> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be > > -- > To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list > please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket > Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
