Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Yes these are all what I thought for a week time! I call GetMessage,
> then check for known/my messages. If none of them, call
> dispatchmessage and all works fine except the problem which goes away
> if we set the WHG_MAX to 800 instead of 100! Now there is no such
> exception thrown--tested with millions of connections.

Ahh, I missed that you use WM_APP + 100, that's a range I would not
use for window messages but something in the higher range of WM_USER
instead.

It's strange anyway that increasing the maximum number of messages made
the error went away since that shouldn't change the base number and range.

However here is a quick text-search in my component folder 

VirtualTreeview:
WM_CHANGESTATE = WM_APP + 32;


VShellTools:
WM_NEWINPUT = WM_APP + 111;
WM_SHELLNOTIFY = WM_APP + 51; // Change in the Shell occured
WM_REMOVEBUTTON = WM_APP + 8; // VirtualShellToolbar
WM_CHANGENOTIFY_CUSTOM = WM_APP + 9;
WM_UPDATESCROLLBAR = WM_APP + 10;
WM_VETBASE = WM_APP + 100
 
and more.. 
So be carefull and find the sender!!

---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html

   


> 
> Francois, will you?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> SZ
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
> 
> 
>>>> This is probably because you post custom messages do you?
>>> 
>>> Yes but they are starting from WM_USER and there are only 4 of them
>>> in this thread. According to help, WM_USER starts from 0x0800 and
>>> there should be enough room until WM_APP+100.
>> 
>> But there must somebody send messages in that range.
>> 
>> At first check whether you send any message to the hidden component
>> window that has not been registered thru a call to
>> WndHandler.AllocateMsgHandler().
>> 
>> Also, you can (should) use your own message pump in a thread, that
>> checks the HWND.
>> 
>> if msg.hwnd = 0 then { Thread message }
>> begin
>>  Any message that was posted to this thread goes here.
>>  In this case you may even PostThreadMessages with message numbers
>>  in the range of ICS messages.
>> end
>> else
>>  Not a thread message, receiver is a window
>> 
>> ---
>> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> Hello Arno,
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:24 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Possible bug and solution in TWndControl
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> When I use the following thread code:
>>>>> 
>>>>> void __fastcall ReverseProxyClientThread::Execute()
>>>>> {
>>>>>  //---- Place thread code here ----
>>>>>  FreeOnTerminate = true;
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 
>>>>>  TIcsWndHandler *windowHandler = new TIcsWndHandler();
>>>>>  windowHandler->MsgLow = WM_APP + 100;
>>>>> 
>>>>>  while(!Terminated)
>>>>>   messagePump();
>>>>> 
>>>>>  delete windowHandler;
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> sometimes we get "Test exception" exception. We have up to 32
>>>>> THttpConnection and 32 THttpCli descendents in this thread. When I
>>>>> raised WHG_MAX to 800, the exception disappears. Francois, could
>>>>> you raise the constant?
>>>> 
>>>> This is probably because you post custom messages do you?
>>> 
>>> Yes but they are starting from WM_USER and there are only 4 of them
>>> in this thread. According to help, WM_USER starts from 0x0800 and
>>> there should be enough room until WM_APP+100.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> SZ
>> --
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
>> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to