Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Yes this approach is the best for FTP/SMTP/POP3 servers. We use a
> dynamic thread pool which remembers the number of threads served in
> the last second and scales the thread destruction/pooling with
> respect to that. This is even better than fixed number of threads.

Of course, my new MT server therefore has both a dynamic thread pool
as well as a dynamic client pool per thread. Threads and clients 
can be preallocated.
 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> SZ
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern
> California 
> 
> 
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system
>>> that is only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can
>>> send you C++ code snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned
>>> IQRP as an example.
>> 
>> I recently started writing a MT TWSocket server component featuring
>> a thread pool as well as a TWsocket pool inside a thread. It allows
>> to set a fixed number of client threads and/or a fixed number of
>> clients per thread. It's possible to grow either in the number of
>> threads or the number of clients per thread, this should meet most
>> requirements. 
>> 
>> ---
>> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> SZ
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket@elists.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern
>>> California
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>>>> There is currently a call for paper
>>>>> (http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526) for the 2006 Developer
>>>>> Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
>>>>> Any killing idea ?
>>>> 
>>>> I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-
>>>> threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets,
>>>> time to clear them up.
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
>>>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
>>>>> The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
>>>>> http://www.overbyte.be
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
>>>> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
>>>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>> --
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
>> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
>> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to