> If someone can help - I wish to have some CVS or SVN to syncronizing our

You can simply put your updated sources on some HTTP or FTP space (Fastream 
can probably provide you a FTP account) so that interested people can 
download it.
It's easy to use WinMerge (OpenSource, search with Google) to track the 
changes.
CVS would be useful if more than a handful people would work on the 
source...

--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Nikolow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Fastream Technologies'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <twsocket@elists.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] BCB support for ICSv6(-SSL)


> Hi all,
>
> After tons of patching, messing, changing I finally was able to compile
> ICSv6 into BCB 2006 (SP2). I think for a second that all problems was 
> gone.
> But I'm wrong.
>
> Sample application with TWSocket can be compiled and runned. When he run 
> it
> show "Class not found" in TWSocket.Create. I dig now around.
>
> If someone can help - I wish to have some CVS or SVN to syncronizing our
> work and track changes. I can easy put project on SourceForge, but project
> is not mine and license is not GPL. If not - there is workaround for
> VisualSourceSafe and SourceOffSite extension but mine line is too weak and 
> I
> don't know how much bandwidth this will require.
>
> Can someone help with this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fastream Technologies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 5:19 PM
> To: SSL implementation for ICS; twsocket@elists.org
> Cc: Peter Nikolow
> Subject: BCB support for ICSv6(-SSL)
>
> Hello,
>
> As you know, Overbyte is fast abandoning the one-window-per-socket design
> implemented in v5 of ICS/ICS-SSL due especially to the inefficiency it
> created is servers. In our tests, with more than a few hundred users
> connected concurrently, ICS v5 simply struggles with performance falling
> from 900 requests per second on web server down to 150. In the age of
> thousands if not tens of thousands of users, this is not feasible.
>
> For the past one and a half month, we (Fastream) are trying to get the v6
> code working under bcb6-2006, yet unsuccessfully. Francois at the 
> beginning
> said this would require 1000Euros of money for the dedication and then 
> said
> he would do it anyway. I think we (BCB users) should unite and help 
> Overbyte
> fix the design problems in the v6 code. Starting from today, I myself will
> dedicate two hours of my work hours to the task each day. Fastream also
> hired Peter Nikolow from Bulgaria as consultant (he is also reading) for
> helping Francois. I would like to know what other BCB ICS users are 
> thinking
> and willing to do about this matter. As a lead coder of a FTPS/HTTPS 
> server
> and HTTPS reverse proxy with ICS, I can confidently propose that this work
> is vital for the future of ICS under BCB.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Sub-Zero (G. I. Ates)
> CSA, www.fastream.com
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be 

-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to