Hello Wilfried, Yes, I also thought that concentrator-to-server could be direct TCP-IP or any other kind of protocol (HTTP tunneling for example), also I found other advantage, I could make concentrator-to-server connection initiator, or server-to-concentrator way so this would be nice whenever there is some NATing on some side.
WM> At first tought I should go for first solution because of a few WM> advantages. WM> - server updates as you say yourself WM> - application is splitted separate according the job it does. WM> The concentrators dealing with the clients and the proto, between WM> concentrator and main server you can exchange data with same or WM> another protocol depending what fit's best, or middleware. -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
