> Do you mean latest release, ICS beta or ICS-SSL?

They are all the same code.  Unfortunately none of the recent developers 
have added dates to the code which means version control is very 
painful, but httpprot.pas was dated 19th November, so recent. 
It include a large number of undocumented NTLM changes that you must 
have done, but which were missing from your 28th August version.  
But at least everything is now consolidated. 

> >I suspect that the encoding header should not be sent with the HEAD
> >request, I'll try and change the code tomorrow.
> Maybe yes, but status 0 is a strange result. Tell us the results of
> your change. Eventually I'll look into it next weekend.

I did make the change earlier, skipping HEAD, and HEAD now works again, 
as does GET with compression.  But I need to do some more testing, 
particularly with 100 meg text files.   

It all falls over horribly if the DLL is missing, but I no intention of 
ever releasing anything with a DLL, so that can be someone's support 
problem, life is too short for DLL hell.  I'll try something more 
reliable tomorrow.  

One of your comments in the source was:

> A future enhancement could be a new option to always send basic 
> authentication.

I can not see any comment saying this was done, do you recall if it 
was.  It would be useful to me, one of my applications talks to an APC 
Masterswitch posting commands with basic authentication, and it's done 
twice at the moment. 

Angus
-- 
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to