On Saturday, 16 May 2020 02:14:57 BST Ian Haywood wrote: > On 16/05/2020 10:55 am, Ian Haywood wrote: > > On 15/05/2020 10:52 am, Glyph wrote: > >> y 14, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanche > >> <mailto:wsanc...@wsanchez.net> > >> > >>> I think it's great to get an SMB implementation in the Twisted > >>> org, but why would we even consider adding something like this to > >>> the main Twisted project? > > > > The advantage of twisted itself is cross-protocol abstractions such as > > cred. Of course you don't have to be in the repo to use them, but in > > practice developers need the discipline of a single project to > > maintain consistency, otherwise the human tendency to reinvent wheels > > is too strong > > Apropos we have two APIs for exporting filesystems which are broadly > similar: SFTP in conch and FTP itself, SMB is about to be a third, > ideally we should have one or have them descend from one another. It's > slightly harder than it sounds as SMB is a file-access, as opposed to > file-transfer, protocol and supports some extra features such as locking.
I do not see a common class tree works for things that are so different as SMB and FTP. Barry > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
