> On Oct 16, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Wim Lewis <w...@hhhh.org> wrote:
>
> Evilham writes:
>> Also, I recall this PR from early summer, which appears to have been
>> OK'd but is blocked by some failure in appveyor + buildbot:
>> https://github.com/twisted/twisted/pull/954
>
> That one's mine. I've finally figured out the Twisted CI infrastructure well
> enough to get things marked green (and I have commit access now as well,
> thanks Glyph!), so that PR is really only waiting for me to read & consider
> some of the review feedback on public attribute names.
>
> Trac 9373 was my attempt to upstream work I did last year on secure dynamic
> dns updates (NSUPDATE + transaction signatures). 9373 has narrowed in scope
> to just the two RR types in PR 954, since there are older tickets for the
> other records. I plan to combine my work with some of the existing abandoned
> PRs for KEY, DNSKEY, and SIG and try to sheperd those through the process but
> that's on the back burner for now.
>
> Russ Nelson is/was also doing some work with Names and these RR types. I
> think he's interested in the server side of secure dyn-dns, but I'm not sure.
> (I was only working on a client implementation.) Both he and I have github
> forks with some of our work in branches, if you'd like to see the direction
> we've been going.
Thanks very much for sending out this summary; sounds like we may have an
actual twisted.names team soon!
> As for DNSSEC, I've seen those arguments against it and I find them pretty
> unconvincing, but I suppose that's a topic for a different thread.
You don't need to convince me! Someone should work on DNSSEC for
twisted.names, and that person should probably think DNSSEC is a good idea, so
I don't want to convince you :-).
-g
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
