> On Oct 1, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Craig Rodrigues <rodr...@crodrigues.org> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Amber Brown <hawk...@atleastfornow.net > <mailto:hawk...@atleastfornow.net>> wrote: > > > Currently, GitHub Issues don't allow for non-committers to make modifications > to categories, milestones, edit the original ticket description, or close > tickets. This kinda sucks, because it makes the pool of triagers smaller, and > also makes most obvious review queue methods harder (adding a category). > > > Are there enough non-committers to Twisted who are actively doing this right > now, to make this > as big an issue as you are claiming? My guess is no.
"Submit for review" is such an action, so, yes. > Other projects related to klein and treq are using GitHub to track issues > instead of Trac. > Do those projects have problem with non-committers triaging issues, despite > the inability to > create/modify categories/milestones, etc.? Yes. It's a huge issue. If I didn't have a regular task to manually comb those trackers I don't know if anything would get looked at; I have nothing to point others at other than "just randomly peruse the list of open issues". Trac is hot garbage but I miss it every time I have to look at my not-quite-working ad-hoc query to figure out what the workflow state on everything there is. That said: if we could get this ALL into github, then we could write ONE query that would be the full review queue for all Twisted org projects. And that would be amazing, a huge upgrade from what we've got now. Finishing txghbot is probably not a ton of work, but it's not zero either. -g
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com https://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
