> On Dec 2, 2014, at 20:05, [email protected] wrote:

> Are there lots of useless docstrings on nested function definitions purely 
> for the sake of twistedchecker?  Or are there undocumented nested functions 
> that are actually a little bit difficult to understand on their own?

twistedchecker does not presently require nested function definitions to have 
docstrings.  I recently merged a fix to an incongruity where it was requiring 
this of classes defined within functions: 
<https://github.com/twisted/twistedchecker/commit/4af4e97f99d6e5f683b65272a8dbe7bce2087aa7>.
  So this one, at least, we can cross off for the future :).

-glyph
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
[email protected]
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Reply via email to