And since it's come up, no, I didn't mean that either. It was a (somewhat colorful) description of my perspective on the question.
Dustin On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Glyph <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:05 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> On 03:31 am, [email protected] wrote: >>> Dustin, >>>> Adding what amounts to a use-after-free bug to the protocol seems like a >>> really bad idea to me. >>> >>> Oh goody, a sarcastic comment which doesn't actually bother to explain the >>> bug :) >> >> Sarcastic? What? Dustin *was* explaining the problem. Without sarcasm, so >> far as I can tell. > > My response may have come across as a little ambiguous, so let me also say - > I think use-after-free is a pretty accurate description of the issue as well, > I don't believe this was intended sarcastically. > > -glyph > > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > [email protected] > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
