correction. I was stupidly reprocessing list on remote copy side. Seeing much better results now ~10K per second.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Kevin Mcintyre <[email protected]> wrote: > I experimented today with a table scan from dynamodb. Taking each record > and converting to a dictionary into a list. Initial scan and transform > took ~8 seconds from amazon to my house over TCP boto which is soapish? i > think. ~7800 records. > > The next call for the remote copy took 7 seconds across the bus. Is that > expected? > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> On Aug 8, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Kevin Mcintyre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think so too, but I'm starting to lean toward websockets. The warnings >> alone right? >> >> >> Websockets are a layer well below what PB does. In fact you could run PB >> over websockets, and it would work roughly the same as over TCP. >> >> But I will take another pass and report back any success. >> >> >> Please do let us know. >> >> -glyph >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Twisted-Python mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list [email protected] http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
