On May 2, 2014, at 1:02 PM, meejah <mee...@meejah.ca> wrote: > Another point for this is that "someday" tor will have UDP support...
There's a reason that the existing interfaces all have "stream" in their names :-). The main reason we didn't do "datagram" at the same time is that there's a pretty clear client/server division in all stream endpoints (one side has to initiate, the other side has to respond) but given the possibilities for multicast / fan-out / fan-in with datagram sockets, "just do what UDP does" didn't seem obviously correct. I'd love it if someone with an interest would make some datagram endpoint interfaces though. -glyph
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python