On Sep 26, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Jonathan Vanasco <twisted-pyt...@2xlp.com> wrote:
> > Quick question about (sub)processes in twisted : > > how bad is it to use the subprocess module ? ( in general / in this > application ) It's pretty bad ;-). > I have the following setup : > > - Twisted Daemon that does 5 things (very well!) > - A new requirement -- to execute 2 scripts on the commandline , one > after the other ( ie, blocking ) > > the 2 commandline scripts are just tossing some PostgreSQL commands via > `postgresql db < file.txt` > > i was looking at reactor.SpawnProcess -- which I know is more correct. it > just seems to be a bit annoying to use , and I know the subprocess module > already. The subprocess module does not have any way to spawn a subprocess and get its output and exit status as events in the reactor; its methods all block. You can sort of re-build spawnProcess yourself from scratch, but ... then you'd just have spawnProcess with a slightly more subprocess-y API, and you'd be better off writing a utility function that wraps spawnProcess for yourself. Could you write up why you feel it's "annoying"? Maybe we can improve spawnProcess so it works better for you in the future. -glyph _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
