On Aug 7, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> FWIW, Maciej commented that they don't expect to be *faster*, because they > actually care about the JSON spec or checking return values. Things which > ultrajson conveniently ignores :-) It's pretty easy to do the wrong thing > fast, but that seems to be a common theme in this thread. I just said "improved", i.e. 2.1 ought to be faster than 2.0, no claims relative to anything else :). I'm aware that ultrajson is pretty bad, but cjson had comparable (if slightly slower) performance. Does it also have correctness and security problems? -glyph
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
