On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Andrew Bennetts <and...@bemusement.org>wrote:
> Kevin Horn wrote: > […] > > Why? What does this buy us? To me it seems more complicated, requires > […] > > > > If it's just an incremental transition, then I think we can get that > > without resorting to relying on the guts of two fairly complicated > systems. > > Although I'm blissfully ignorant of the deeper, darker details of > docutils and sphinx (and hope to remain so), I feel compelled to point > out that an incremental transition is more than a “just”. You can start > reaping the rewards of the new system sooner and with less risk than an > all-or-nothing transition, it reduces merge conflicts for > work-in-progress doc branches, etc. > > So I'd say incremental transition is closer to a “must” than a “just”! > > -Andrew. > Yes, that was "just" in the sense of "only", rather than in the sense of "merely". :) -- Kevin Horn
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
