On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Sergey Gerasimov <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Itamar Turner-Trauring [mailto:ita...@futurefoundries.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2013 4:38 AM > *To:* ser...@gmail.com; Twisted general discussion > *Subject:* Re: [Twisted-Python] combine local and remote calls in > perspective brokers**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Sergey Gerasimov <ser...@gmail.com> > wrote:**** > > Hello to all!**** > > **** > > I’m using PB as communication protocol for components of my system.**** > > Components can be located locally on the only one machine or in > distributed fashion. It depends on the config file.**** > > **** > > At the moment all communications are implemented as callRemote calls. I > would like to keep this unified way of communication but make inter-machine > calls as efficient as possible. What is the best way to do that?**** > > ** ** > > When you say "locally", is it still different processes talking to each > other? Talking over TCP loopback on the same machine is pretty efficient, > and unlikely to be a bottleneck, so you don't necessarily have to do > anything special.**** > > ** ** > > -Itamar**** > > ** ** > > Itamar,**** > > ** ** > > nn my case “locally” means local objects in the only one process. **** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python > > Hi It is fine to run both of sides within the same process, many test suites in twisted do this.
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
