On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:26 PM, <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > On 04:28 pm, albert.bra...@weiermayer.com wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:17:04AM -0400, Itamar Turner-Trauring wrote: >>>The .tac file (or application.py) should typically be two lines of >>>code, >>>just importing everything from elsewhere, so really just having it in >>>Python seems the easiest solution. >> >>This is a good argument. I was afraid that having the application as >>source code might help in reverse engineering it, but starting the >>debugger in the application does not reveal much information for >>modules >>that are compiled. > > This is the obligatory post in which it is pointed out that .pyc files > are basically equivalent to .py files as far as revealing your source > goes.
As the code comments are stripped from .pyc files, most enterprise grade applications are safe. If that stuff is not complicated enough - then it can be rewritten from scratch anyway. -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
