On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:46 PM, <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand this. What is a "Master-Slave" protocol? Why > would someone not benefit from a Twisted-based implementation of such a > protocol?
OK I'm not sure either ;-) this is why I ask. But in my case I have the following situation: behind my serial port I have a bus system made of me (the master) and some slaves. The slaves are absolute passive until I send them a command. After I've send a command to one of my slaves the salve ALWAY reply by sending a packet. So what's the benefit if I have a "deamon thread" waiting the hole time to get something from the serial line if the only time it can get something is immediately after the master has send a packet? The communication is totally synchronous. - Markus -- __________________________________________________________________ IMKO Micromodultechnik GmbH Markus Hubig System Administration & Development Im Stoeck 2 D-76275 Ettlingen / GERMANY HR: HRB 360936 Amtsgericht Mannheim President: Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Kurt Koehler Tel: 0049-(0)7243-5921-26 Fax: 0049-(0)7243-5921-40 e-mail: mhu...@imko.de internet: www.imko.de _________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
