On 08/24/2010 07:32 PM, Andrew Francis wrote: > Hi > > >> I can't find any examples of using Twisted with wxPython, were wx is in >> a seperate thread. I used to have one somewhere but can' t find it >> either. I'm looking because for some reason my code doesn't work (the >> GUI freezes), even though I use reactor.callFromThread() for Twisted >> calls from wx and wx.CallAfter() for wx calls from Twisted. Can anyone >> point me to an example? >> > This may be off topic but isn't there a wxReactor() so that you can > avoid a separate thread? > > Cheers, > Andrew >
Yes, I know, but I'm using Twisted in a way that I allow blocking because it doesn't matter in my application, I receive a msg then access hardware and therefor I can only do one thing at a time (with this hardware anyways). If I use wxreactor with this model the GUI freezes up when I access the IO. I used to use wxreactor, put the IO calls in a queue and run one after another in a thread but this posed other problems when I needed to interact in between the GUI, the network (Twisted) and the IO threads, with my current code it has become much simpler and more reliable. Cheers, Gabriel _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
