On Jun 19, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Hatem Oraby wrote: > Thank you for advice and suggestion Gylph, The point is that twistedSim in > not restricted only to Twisted Framework (I.e. It can run with any > event-based network application), Its true that TwistedSim give a special > attention to Twisted (and thats where the current name came from), however > renaming it to start with tx would be unfair as this will mean that it > simulates only Twisted Framework.
That sounds good to me. I believe I saw some chatter about this in the #twisted channel on Freenode. While I think some of the implementation decisions are ... somewhat questionable, I think it's valuable to have a network simulator for applications that don't use the Twisted APIs too :). > I respect your intentions about adapting to standards and not to confuse > users, I will change in hopefully in the next major update the name to > something other than TwistedSim but it will probably something new that > doesn't restrict it as a Twisted extension (i.e. won't start with tx). Your consideration is much appreciated. I look forward to hearing the new name. _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
