On 03:54 pm, vlad.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi all!
>
> Stuck with AmpList again :( Im trying to send/retrieve data much
>larger
>then 64K and choose AmpList cause it "Convert a list of dictionaries
>into a
>list of AMP boxes".
>
>My original data looks like a long list of dicts [ {1}, {2}, ..., {x}
>].
>I convert it to [
> {'data': 'json encoded 1,2 dicts'},
> {'data': 'json encoded 3,4 dicts}',
> ...
>] hoping EACH element in converted list will be converted to AmpBox and
>retriever on wire.
>
>However, still got TooLong exception on AmpBox.serialize(). AmpBox
>trying to
>serialize all my converted list but not each dict in it separately.
>
>Does this behavior ok, or this is a bug?
When you use an AmpList, the value is still serialized as a single key's
value string, so the 64k limit still applies, even if it has sub-
structures of its own, none of which exceed the limit.
At the Twisted sprint hosted by Flumotion last weekend, some people were
working on adding real streaming support to AMP. I think most of the
progress made was in understanding how the implementation should work,
though.
The associated ticket is #2529.
>
>--
>WBR, Vlad
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
