On 06:00 pm, kevin.h...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:00 AM, lasizoillo <lasizoi...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>2009/11/11 Kevin Horn <kevin.h...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > I have written up a proposal here: >> > >> > http://twistedsphinx.funsize.net/proposal.html >> > >> >>In this proposal you say: >> >>Development Work >> * fabric fabfile for automation of docs workflow >> >>Future Work >> * This page has some stuff on using cog in RestructuredText comments >>to generate the output of sample scripts. >> >>The second point (in Future Work) uses cog that is integrated in >>paver: >> * Paver allow automation of docs workflow (fabric is not needed). >> * With paver you can create an bootstraped instalation: >> >>http://www.blueskyonmars.com/projects/paver/getting_started.html#but- >>people-don-t-have-paver-yet >> * Paver is compatible with setuptools and distutils. >> >>I think that fabric is great for cluster distributions, but paver is >>better for manage docs. >> >>Regards, >> Javi >For the moment, I plan to continue using fabric, for the following >reasons: > >- I'm already familiar with it >- it does what I need (run local commands, and send stuff over SSH) > >I think Paver might be very useful down the road, though. I'll >definitely >check into it more as this project progresses.
Paver and fabric and such are only significant for the conversion, though, right? Jean-Paul _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
