But why is this odious if it's completely invisible to the end user? (for that matter, why is it odious even if it *is* obvious to the end user?) You have video of a sporting event and you audio of commentators adding play-by-play and color. As long as they arrive on your TV screen simultaneously, what difference would it make whether they were originally recorded at the same time? It shouldn't have any effect on the end user's experience whatsoever.
Doug Fields
Tampa, FL
---------- Original Message --------
Subject: [TV orNotTV] Online Olympics
From: PGage <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, August 03, 2012 11:09 am
To: [email protected]
BTW, the article linked above speculates that at least some of NBC's gymnastics coverage is of what I have identified as the most odious type - commentary added *after* recording the event. This is based on the observation that during the qualifying Miller online did not mention the possibility that Wieber might not make the all arounds until near the end (when this began to seem possible), meanwhile on the tape delayed NBC coverage they were talking about that possibility from the beginning.
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
