On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:12:48PM -0800, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > As I move through my learning process, I am wanting to do some http posts, > etc. I know that there is a http class,
Do you perhaps the http package (not class)? https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.html > but I also am aware of httplib2, but it still seems to be in eternal > alpha. What leads you to that conclusion? If you're talking about this: https://github.com/jcgregorio/httplib2 I don't see any sign that it is alpha version software. According to the readme file, it is at version 0.8. I don't see any signs that the author publicly releases any alpha or beta versions, they all appear to be ready for production. But if you have seen something that suggests otherwise, please point it out, because I'm happy to be corrected. > Which would be better? (However you > want to define better) I've never used httplib2, but it seems to be a well-known and often-used third-party library under active development. Unfortunately the documentation seems a bit mixed, the ref.tex file looks like it hasn't been updated since version 0.3 over seven years ago. If you're intending to open and read from http://... URLs, you shouldn't directly use the http library as it is too low-level. Instead you should use the urllib library. https://docs.python.org/3/library/urllib.request.html#module-urllib.request Sticking to the standard library has the advantage that it is always available, but using third-party libraries instead may have the advantage that it is better/faster/more featureful/more rapidly updated etc. -- Steven _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
