On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Marc Tompkins <marc.tompk...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Seriously, though, how is
>> 1) Do {this} forever, until something happens that I'll tell you about
>> later
>>
>> better than
>> 2) Do {this} until this condition, which I'm telling you about RIGHT
>> NOW, changes
>> ?
>
> Here's how:
>
> The first of them is already implemented in Python, and works well
> enough for the purpose. This is a significant benefit the other lacks.
>
> The second one is not implemented in Python, and there are no successful
> proposals (which, by the way, are better discussed at the Python Ideas
> forum <URL:https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas>) to
> implement them in a way that justifies the cost of adding it to the
> language.
Actually, if you read the Python docs - 8.2 for Python 3:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-while-statement
or 7.2 for Python 2:
https://docs.python.org/2/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-while-statement
you'll see that it _is_ implemented:
> The while statement is used for repeated execution as long as an expression
> is true:
> while_stmt ::= "while" expression ":" suite
> ["else" ":" suite]
> This repeatedly tests the expression and, if it is true, executes the first
> suite;
> if the expression is false (which may be the first time it is tested) the
> suite of the else clause, if present, is executed and the loop terminates.
So I don't know where you got the idea that I wanted to change the language.
However, I will admit that, until a few minutes ago, I had not read this:
https://docs.python.org/2/faq/design.html#why-can-t-i-use-an-assignment-in-an-expression
which deals with my preferred "while" syntax as an edge case:
> There’s an alternative way of spelling this that seems attractive but is
> generally less robust than the “while True” solution:
One might ask whether the designer(s) of the language are on speaking
terms with whoever wrote that paragraph - but I bow my head to Guido's
(or whoever's) wisdom.
In any case, I wholeheartedly agree with the next paragraph, which states:
> The best approach is to use iterators, making it possible to loop through
> objects using the for statement.
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
