On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think that's just an editing mistake. If you replace the word "iterator" > with "construct" then it makes sense: We have seen that the for statement is > such a construct.
Fair enough. Thanks. But I think that it underlines the ease with which the language is used loosely, which does get confusing quickly when one is still putting together the concepts. I really appreciated your lengthy post distinguishing iterators from iterables, and I'm going to go back over it someday that I'm not sick and I have a spare neuron or two. -- Keith _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
