On 2017-03-09 18:45, Ul wrote: > Am 09.03.2017 um 15:29 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > On 2017-03-09 14:23, Ul wrote: > >> If you just follow the lot relations made by production, you are right. > >> But as i explained to Sergi, i added a aditional field 'supplier_lot' to > >> move, that is filled by shipment in, as i do not want to use the Lot > >> numbers of the supplier internally, but of cause have to track my lots > >> back to them. > > > > But this could be simply managed by adding the field supplier_lot on the > > lot instead of adding a new field on the move. > this way i have the supplier Lot as a independent Lot that is nicely > integrated in my tree. for example: http://pasteboard.co/HpSrF4dk8.png > The lots with a party as origin are supplier lots, and with the context > menu i can change to the supplier or the shipment..
I do not understand. For me, there is no independent lot possible. Your internal lot should always come from the same supplier lot. So the information about supplier lot could be stored on the lot. But of course you can add a Function field on stock move to show it next to the lot. > > With that, you stay standard and your view could be integrated in > > Tryton. > > > For integration in tryton it anyway has to be a separate module, as it > requires production module and stock_lot module. So why not using my > supplier_lot in move too. I can share my whole module (called > stock_lot_trace) if you are interested. But I'm afraid it does not yet > comply with your programming standards... Of course, it is interesting to have production traceability. But it must fit with the generic concept of Tryton. But for me, the need of supplier_lot is not understood. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20170309181352.GB87763%40tetsuo.
