2016-11-17 14:12 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > On 2016-11-17 02:36, Xavier Codinas wrote: > > Hello, > > When going to an inactive party and looking into it's addresses (which > are > > inactive) those are not shown in the form view but other data is shown. > Is > > this the expected behavior? IMHO, the addresses should be shown like the > > other data is. > > Yes it is the expected behaviour because there is no information if the > addresses were inactivated at the same time as the party. >
> > Also, should the addresses be marked as inactive when the party is marked > > as inactive? For me, if you set the party to inactive all the related > > addresses should be set as inactive too, because they are no more needed. > > I do not think addresses should be inactivated when the party is > inactivated. Because the address could be still needed to be searched on > document encoded prior to the inactivation of the party. > > But indeed I think there could be improvement for the list of addresses > to not show the addresses of inactivated parties. > > And how can that improvement be done? By adding a default search filter to address list? > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: [email protected] > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tryton" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms > gid/tryton/20161117131226.GW16659%40tetsuo. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/CAFaTT038BvyWCQ%2BqQHKf4bsOPXA0Npz-e%3DRC6vN-pc0Ch8D52A%40mail.gmail.com.
