El 07/02/18 a les 18:22, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> On 2018-02-07 18:01, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
>> El 07/02/18 a les 17:51, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
>>> On 2018-02-07 17:27, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
>>>> El 07/02/18 a les 16:43, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
>>>>> On 2018-02-07 16:26, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The account_deposit module defines a new kind of account (Deposit
>>>>>> account) but there is no deposit account on the Spanish CoA. After a
>>>>>> little bit of digging i found that the Spanish CoA includes deposit
>>>>>> accounts for customers (4380) and suppliers (4070), so this accounts
>>>>>> should be marked as deposit. This requires to add the account_deposit as
>>>>>> dependency of the account_es module, but not sure if this is the best
>>>>>> way as this module also adds new functionaly on party and invoice which
>>>>>> is not relevant to people not using the deposit functionaly.
>>>>> You may put those account inside a extra depend module.
>>>> The main issue here is that this account should be included on the
>>>> balance sheet so probably the best is to use the deposit kind when the
>>>> account_deposit module is installed and the other type when not installed.
>>> I do not think it is possible to do that.
>> I've achieved it by adding the the following code at the end of the xml
>> definition:
>>
>>     <data depends="account_deposit">
>>         <record id="pgc_4070_normal" model="account.account.template"
>> update="1">
>>             <field name="kind">deposit</field>
>>             <field name="party_required" eval="True"/>
>>         </record>
>>         <record id="pgc_4380_normal" model="account.account.template"
>> update="1">
>>             <field name="kind">deposit</field>
>>             <field name="party_required" eval="True"/>
>>         </record>
>>     </data>
> Are you sure that the ir.model.data is correct when the module
> account_deposit is activated?

fs_values only contains the values of the last update (kind and
party_required) but other fields are not computed. Which if i understand
correctly this is not correct.

Is this something that we should fix?


-- 
Sergi Almacellas Abellana
www.koolpi.com
Twitter: @pokoli_srk

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tryton-dev" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton-dev/509cd148-e8e3-e194-560e-5f80e000af39%40koolpi.com.

Reply via email to