On 2017-03-21 17:47, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> El 21/03/17 a les 14:33, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> > But the main difficulty in introducing a new kind of abstract type which
> > is not common/standard is to have it supported by all backends.
> > And this makes me think that Tryton should not do too much in this area
> > as far as it allows customization of the database schema transparently.
> 
> The problem i see here is that you have to manually change the database
> schema, which adds a lot of complexity when dealing with a big number of
> databases or a big number of custom fields. That's why I prefer to create a
> module that does it for me.

I see no reason it could only be done manually.

-- 
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tryton-dev" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton-dev/20170321171948.GD43953%40tetsuo.

Reply via email to