* Pierre-Louis Bonicoli [2014-11-20 23:26:40]: > On 20/11/2014 20:53, Nicolas Évrard wrote: > > > > In my opinion, Nereid should not be part of Tryton, but flask-tryton > > should not either, and morepath-tryton neither and pyramid-tryton > > neither. > > > > What should be part of tryton is reusable components that allow people > > creating web interface on any of the aforementioned projects to start > > with a good reusable basis and a good design. > > > > Just like we don't have all the variation of workflows on sale or > > purchase, we should not have all the variations people are going to > > use to access the Tryton server through an HTTP frontend. > > It is a pity that you didn't answer this when Sharoon first asked [1], > nor when you presented flask-tryton [2].
In fact at those times I had next to no opinion about Nereid / flask-tryton / Pyramid / WhatEver :D. What made me realize that this is the right way to go (in my opinion) is this year's discussions with Jan about morepath / pyramid. Having so much different possibilities made me aware that we should be web-development library agnostic and focus on the ERP-related stuffs. > It gives the impression that you aren't willing to accept a big > amount of code/work from others. I am sorry you have this impression, but you can be assured that if anybody provides a patch in order to migrate to python3 or GTK3, I will be more than happy to include it ;). -- Nicolas Évrard - B2CK SPRL E-mail/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
signature.asc
Description: signature
