Am 04.09.2014 08:53 schrieb "Cédric Krier" <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > On 04 Sep 01:04, Simon Klemenc wrote: > > Am 04.09.2014 00:17 schrieb "Cédric Krier" <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > > > > > On 03 Sep 23:56, Simon wrote: > > > > Am 03.09.2014 um 23:13 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > > > >On 03 Sep 11:11, Simon Klemenc wrote: > > > > >>On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 11:07:44 PM UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > > >>>On 02 Sep 09:14, simon....@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > > > >>>>hi there, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>first thing, im sorry for doing this in reverse order: i have > > already > > > > >>>>opened a codereview at http://codereview.tryton.org/10481002/ and am > > > > >>>now > > > > >>>>writing in here to state my motivation. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>the reason i even took a deeper look at modules/__init__.py was > > that i > > > > >>>>wanted to run tryton in a more project/framework oriented way: > > having a > > > > >>>>project folder with tryton modules and my own modules, similar to > > how a > > > > >>>>common django-project would look like. This would ease the process > > of > > > > >>>>developing (getting started using sqlite straight away) and creating > > > > >>>>docker-instances a lot for me. > > > > >>>This is a wrong goal and will not land in Tryton because: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - it does enforce uniqueness of module name > > > > >>> > > > > >>Really, did you ever try to load more than one module with non-unique > > names? > > > > >>I doubt you would ever succeed on this for quite some reasons: > > [including > > > > >>links :) ] > > > > >It is by design! Directory names are *unique*. > > > > > > > > i cant follow your argumentation: > > > > why is it a "wrong goal" to enforce name-uniqueness first and "by > > design" > > > > later on? > > > > > > OK I was not clear. Currently by design module name is enforced to be > > > unique because of the single directory. > > > > Ok thanks, so name-uniqueness is the desired behaviour.. > > this would not change with a key-value dictionary as a central registry > > like in the patch > > It is changed with such design. You are just silently hide conflicts.
It is no problem to either raise or just log a warning.. also in the current state i think it might be possible to have a module in the tryton tree + a seperate egg, which might lead to unpredictable behaviour.. correct me if im wrong > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ Regarding the module i did not say it should be i just meant to say it is a possibility, i think it is in openerp, so if someone wants it he could make it... (not that i really want that as there is already docker..) sorry for top posting, it was not related to any dedicated reply Simon
