On Jul 9, 2014, at 3:41 AM, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08 Jul 14:14, [email protected] wrote: >> On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 10:15:29 PM UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote: >>> >>> Developers work on what ever they want, they are not forced to work on >>> any specific topic. So nobody can tell what will be developed in Tryton >>> more than what is already done (and probably published as patch). So if >>> you are looking for a roadmap, you are at the wrong place. >>> >> >> I was not talking about a roadmap of new features but a roadmap (or todo >> list) of features to be removed (such as multi-database support). > > Something added or something removed, it is the same. It is an > improvement and they fail on the same workflow. > That being said, I am not sure that removing multiple-database support is a “improvement” that has wider acceptance. I personally feel its a step backward. Multi-database support has been a critical advantage of tryton and we use it for a variety of reasons from having a demo/playground database in the same environment for users to try things safely along with production database to having multi-tenant systems. From the previous discussion about the topic and the available information I don’t see why multi-database support should be removed. If creating and dropping databases is the issue, we should remove that instead. My 2¢ Thanks & Regards Sharoon Thomas CEO & Chief Software Architect Openlabs Technologies & Consulting (P) Limited w: http://www.openlabs.co.in m: +1 813.793.6736 (OPEN) Extn. 200 t: @sharoonthomas - We win when our customers win
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
