On 07 Jul 09:42, Sharoon Thomas wrote: > On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Oscar Alvarez <gere...@presik.com> wrote: > > > > > On 08/06/14 17:23, Cédric Krier wrote: > >> On 08 Jun 16:39, Oscar Alvarez wrote: > >>> Hi Devs > >>> > >>> You consider the possiblity of migration to Qt5 instead of Gtk3? > >>> > >>> I know this is not easy and is a big change, but I have saw that some > >>> applications recently gives the skip to gtk2 -> Qt, for technical reasons > > > > > > Maybe somebody can give another point of view, of course is welcome :) > > Found this gnome blog [1] yesterday from hacker news. Seemed relevant to the > discussion here.
Not at all because it is only about distritbuting compiled application without the source which is not allowed by the GPL. Also for me, the arguments are wrong: http://www.upstream-tracker.org/versions/gtk+.html http://www.upstream-tracker.org/versions/qt.html > The comments/discussion [2] on hn also has several arguments related to this > topic of QT vs GTK. It is just like the eternal flamwar between vi vs emacs. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpbUSU_B2Rle.pgp
Description: PGP signature
