On 16 Jun 18:51, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > 2014-06-15 21:33 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, > > > > I tested sao with this: > > https://jquery-ui-bootstrap.github.io/jquery-ui-bootstrap/ > > There are some issues like button with 2 icons but globally it renders the > > application nicer. I think we could try to help the project to fix those > > issues and maybe we could use it as default theme instead of the > > jquery-ui.css. > > > > Sounds good to me. We at NaN·tic have talked several times that bootstrap > looks much better than jquery-ui themes. Even some people argued about > using bootstrap without jquery-ui. What is the advantage of using jquery-ui > + bootstrap instead of just using bootstrap? What is the missing > functionality we need?
The advantage is that jquery-ui does it best to support older browser when bootstrap just doesn't care at all and rely on latest feature of browsers. Also bootstrap is missing some widget we need: - autocomplete - datepicker - menu Maybe some of them could be implemented using bootstrap but it is much easier with jquery-ui because it is designed as a javascript library when bootstrap is much more designed as a css with some javascript when there is no other solution. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgppfgjLkexhU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
