On 15 May 12:50, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton-dev] Test and dependecies" (Wed, 14 May 2014 > 16:06:49 +0200): > > > On 14 May 11:26, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > The second issue is, that sooner or later there *can* be the case, where a > > > dependent module will add constraints breaking a test in the former > > > module. > > > Just not implementing necessary constraints, because they could break > > > tests, > > > can not be the goal. > > > > But such module will be just like account_stock_continental, a bad > > designed module. > > So you mean basically, that adding a requires on a field of a supered > model is generally bad design?
Yes constraints are always bad. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgp6xTOcMdYFP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
