On 17 Jan 10:19, Àngel Àlvarez Serra wrote: > Hi, > > I move here a discussion from codereview http://codereview.tryton.org/1221003/ > > I've tested the codereview and i find a terrible issue usability > because when you assign moves to packages don't filter assigned moves > if you not save record previously.
I want to lower this issue because:
- there is a workaround by saving after each package creation
- user must encode what he does and so he don't rely on the
application to enter the data
- if the same move is twice picked, at the end it will be only in
one package and the module will warn him about missing packed
move.
> I'll encourage you to test the module and try to assign small picking
> with 25 lines and split some of them, and try to not get lost after
> third move.
Such testing is wrong if you don't put yourself in the real condition.
> I'll propuse a solution:
>
> We can do functional field that contains all moves assigned to
> package, updated by on_change and add into domain to filter all moves
> that already have a package.
>
> I am agree with @cedric than this is crappy but we need a solution.
At least not this one.
> I have a second option, to avoid this crappy code. If you assign
> package directly from moves, you can follow your assigment on time
> without get lost.
I don't understand.
--
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpVDx7zl2366.pgp
Description: PGP signature
