On 30/09/10 19:31 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> > > > > 2) Will we lose all those differentiated operators like 'Begins with',
> > > > > 'Is'. etc.?
> > > > > 
> > > > > The ideal solution for me would be to have this one-liner-interface
> > > > > (provided it can be done in a sufficient sophisticated way) on top of
> > > > > the form with all other search fields (the well known search interface
> > > > > until now) collapsed. If the search fields could be shown (extended)
> > > > > with a click on an arrow just besides the one-liner-interface all 
> > > > > users
> > > > > could have their prefered interface.
> > > > 
> > > > The goals is to get rid of the current search view because it is not
> > > > powerfull enough, it takes too much place and it is hard to extend it
> > > > (like having full text search).
> > > 
> > > The current proposal loses some differentiated operators, so it is less
> > > powerful. It wouldn't take any place if being collapsed at first sight. 
> > > Full
> > > text search could be only for the one-liner.
> > 
> > There will not be less operators. Every operators in trytond will be 
> > available
> > which means there will be more operators. 
> 
> Of which operators are you talking? Those of
> http://doc.tryton.org/1.6/trytond/doc/topics/domain.html? 
> Those don't contain operators like 'start with', 'end with'.

'start with' = ilike '...%'
'end with'= ilike '%...'

> 
> > In fact I readed the code and
> > Bertrand did not follow what we talked. He uses only "ilike" operators but
> > this must be only the default one and operators could be define after the
> > field.
> 
> Ok, sounds much better to me, but I still don't know, how you would want to
> name those operators e.g. 'start with' or 'end with'. It will be difficult to
> find intuitive descriptors while keeping simplicity for the user. Perhaps a
> list of possible operators could open via completion after inserting a field?

Most of operators are simple =, <, > etc.
ilike is the default
in will be the default when the value is a list
child_of will need to be defined (but I'm not sure it is useful in UI).


-- 
Cédric Krier

B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: pgpAasivUjgQa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to