On Saturday, 2014-06-07, 14:26:49, Jan Kundrát wrote: > One thing which I'm unsure about is splitting the concept of recipients > into three parts (To, Cc, Bcc). Maybe it would make more sense to use a > two-column model, first column tracking the type of the recipient > (to/cc/bcc), the other column storing the addresses. This might seem > unintuitive at first; this order is not preserved during the MIME > serialization, after all.
Actually I think that makes a lot of sense. I mainly followed the draft in the reviewboard request, just using a proper model to allow more details than just the address. But indeed, a single model for all recipients and type being one of the data fields (separate column or special item role) sounds even better. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
