On Monday 12 August 2013 15:34:18 Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Monday, 12 August 2013 15:30:16 CEST, Pali Rohár wrote: > > It is needed for static linked plugins. It does not make > > sense to statically link some plugin (e.g default password > > storage in config file) into trojita executable and then > > depends on shared commit dynamic library for plugins... > > Let me rephrase my question, then: > > What is the point of supporting static plugins? I do not > understand the technical benefits of providing this option. > What use case does it solve?
This providing support for fallback default plugins such as clear text password storage. This means when system trojita plugins are not available it is still posible to use trojita with weak password storage. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
