ah, misread. Semantic colour names would work once we have agreed on the semantics. The current palette implementation links too many things together so are working on a better alternative
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350915 Title: [sdk] Colors should have symbolic names Status in Ubuntu UX bugs: Fix Released Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Reading http://developer.ubuntu.com/api/qml/sdk-14.10/Ubuntu.Components.UbuntuColors/ the documentation suggests to use e.g blue for selection ... shouldn't we rather have named colors, e.g "selectionColor"? This way, if the theme change a day we don't need to patch every single application we are shipping to change the color! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1350915/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
