> I'll upload it using git-ubuntu style, too, so it will be easier to do
the next merge.

I must get Robie to remind me what I need to stuff in the .changes file
to make that automatic (I vaguely recall him mentioning there were some
extra tags that could/should be placed there).

> Using a "ubuntu/bionic" gbp branch, is probably as useless as using a
"debian/unstable" branch in Ubuntu's development release. I wonder if we
could/should drop that part of the delta on the next occasion.

Yes -- during the merge I initially dropped that change, but then
reverted it because it made the range-diff a little noisier for no
particularly good reason. Still, I do agree it's basically pointless and
should be dropped.

> This seems to be generally useful. Would you mind sending this patch
to Debian, so we can eventually drop it from our delta?

Will do.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959211

Title:
  Please merge dbus 1.14.0-2 from Debian unstable.

Status in dbus package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Please merge dbus 1.14.0-2 from Debian unstable.

  Updated changelog and diff against Debian unstable to be attached
  below.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1959211/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to