> I'll upload it using git-ubuntu style, too, so it will be easier to do the next merge.
I must get Robie to remind me what I need to stuff in the .changes file to make that automatic (I vaguely recall him mentioning there were some extra tags that could/should be placed there). > Using a "ubuntu/bionic" gbp branch, is probably as useless as using a "debian/unstable" branch in Ubuntu's development release. I wonder if we could/should drop that part of the delta on the next occasion. Yes -- during the merge I initially dropped that change, but then reverted it because it made the range-diff a little noisier for no particularly good reason. Still, I do agree it's basically pointless and should be dropped. > This seems to be generally useful. Would you mind sending this patch to Debian, so we can eventually drop it from our delta? Will do. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959211 Title: Please merge dbus 1.14.0-2 from Debian unstable. Status in dbus package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: Please merge dbus 1.14.0-2 from Debian unstable. Updated changelog and diff against Debian unstable to be attached below. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1959211/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp