Indeed https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1384746/comments/2 should be tracked else where. It really should split out into two separate tracking issues.
1. either generating the feature file from the kernel on build. To track this I have opened https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/217 to track. 2. OS integration so that a kernel packages can build cache files on install. To track this I have opened https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/218 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues #217 https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/217 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues #218 https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/218 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384746 Title: Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files Status in AppArmor: Fix Released Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: The AppArmor parser should support multiple directories of policy cache files. Directories should be specific to a certain AppArmor kernel feature set. From a distro standpoint, this would allow policy caches to be created during kernel install/upgrade. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1384746/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
