It would be interesting to know if the issue is due to the differences in the toolchain used to build elfutils 0.183-6 and 0.183-8. The build logs show they were 10.2.1-23ubuntu2 and 11.2.0-1ubuntu2, respectively. If we built 2 copies of 0.183-8 in the same environment, but just varied the different gcc versions, would the problem follow the compiler?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413 Title: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0 Status in elfutils package in Ubuntu: New Status in mozc package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in protobuf package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: When trying to build package mozc for arm64 the following error popped up: lto1: fatal error: bytecode stream in file ‘/usr/lib/aarch64-linux- gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0 Why does the library contain LTO information at all? Best regards Heinrich To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/1939413/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
