The apparmor profile isn't in Debian yet and I've seen no effort to do so 
[1][2] yet.
Therefore for now just update the profile we have.

Therefore I proposed [3] which converted your contribution to the
changes that will be needed on the packaging.

P.S. I've spoken to Andreas and he said there was no old deny for
apparmor in Debian, so we should at some point be able to get it there
as well (with the fix then).

[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/paelzer-guest/openldap/-/merge_requests
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=yes&src=openldap
[3]: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+git/openldap/+merge/395730

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909748

Title:
  Apparmor profile improvements for letsencrypt

Status in openldap package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  I can see that the slapd apparmor profile goes 90% of the way to
  working out of the box with letsencrypt/certbot, but fails to include
  abstractions/ssl_keys. The attached patch should work support all the
  methods in these abstractions, and should be the default with the
  slapd package.

  Please can you look at including this in future?

  Many thanks,
  Paul.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1909748/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to